The last map without ads is about to disappear.
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman broke the news that Apple is planning to introduce advertising in its Maps app as early as next year.
The format may be similar to the App Store's search ads – merchants can spend money to make their store information appear higher in the search results.
This news is not big, and it only occupies a corner in the continuous technology sector, but I still feel regretful——
The last map without ads is probably about to disappear.

A clean system is a beautiful misunderstanding
in the country, Apple Maps is a very special existence.
Due to the limitation of surveying and mapping qualifications, its map data actually comes from AutoNavi, and business information is largely captured from Dianping.com. It can be said to be a complete "piece of jigsaw puzzle", and it is also like a "patchwork monster" of Guo-style aesthetics + domestic business data.
The few Apple Maps users are probably already accustomed to facing questions from others: Why don’t you use Amap and Dianping, which have more complete functions and more accurate information?
I think the answer of the few users in China and I would be surprisingly consistent: for some peace and quiet.
In the context of the Chinese Internet, "free" has always been expensive. The platform provides tools, and you become traffic. The platform needs to use this traffic to exchange for advertising fees, to complete the O2O closed loop, and to build its business empire.
Baidu Maps and Amap Maps are both products of this business logic. Their essence is a super aggregation of catering, hotels, taxi-hailing, and entertainment. They must be lively, crowded, and must do everything possible to make you "click" and "click" again and again.

Apple is unique. It won't pop up a red envelope offering a ride before you start navigating. It won't force a 20% discount coupon on you when you search for "coffee." It won't become a loud, noisy beauty or comedian, and then cover your driveway with ads when you just want to drive quietly…
It's just a map, nothing more.

This kind of tranquility is so precious that we are willing to tolerate its occasional inaccurate routes and delayed information, and maintain this specialness with an almost tolerant attitude.
This particularity further reflects the "tacit understanding" that consumers have always had towards Apple –
I paid a lot of money for my iPhone. I paid a high premium for the hardware, and in return you should give me a clean, secure, and undisturbed system.
This is fair and ideal.

Ironically, the "tacit understanding" we believe in may just be a decade-long wishful thinking.
The reason why there have been no advertisements on Maps is not because Apple doesn’t want to, but because it has inherent defects and it has taken a lot of time to improve them.
Fast forward to 2012, the world was bustling, "Gangnam Style" was a global hit, Nokia released its last generation of Symbian flagship 808, and the London Olympics had just ended.
In Silicon Valley, Apple and Google were breaking up.
When the iPhone was first released, it had Google Maps built in, but as iOS and Android became sworn enemies, Apple couldn't stand having its lifeline in the hands of its rival.
So, Apple Maps was hastily launched.

In September 2012, Apple replaced Google Maps with its own mapping service in iOS 6. However, the newly launched Apple Maps had a large number of outrageous problems: incorrect landmarks, distorted 3D views, melting roads, disappearing buildings, route navigation failures, etc., and was severely criticized by users and media around the world.
In response to this public relations disaster, Tim Cook published a rare open letter to users on September 28, 2012, in which he wrote:
At Apple, we strive to build world-class products that provide the best possible experience for our customers. Last week, we launched the new Maps app, but it didn't live up to that promise. We're deeply sorry for the frustration this has caused our customers, and we're working hard to make Maps even better.
Starting from such a low point is actually a good thing.
Apple Maps, which has crawled out of the ruins, has no time to compete head-on with Google. Its top priority is to avoid making a fool of itself and to do a good job of the "map" itself, so it has no time to care about advertising.
For several years after that, Apple continued to patch up its maps. It wasn't until iOS 9 in 2015 that Apple added basic features such as bus routes. In 2018, Apple announced that they would start from scratch and rebuild the entire map using 100% self-collected data.
This version was not launched throughout the United States until early 2020. Apple Maps can be said to have just been perfected.

What followed was the AI wave we are familiar with, and the attention of this giant shifted again on a large scale. This wishful tacit understanding survived for a while.
Today's Apple Maps is not only usable, but also has unique features in some aspects: for example, in overseas areas, Apple Maps' 3D building modeling effect is unmatched by any other third-party map.
Our Pure Land, Commercial Waste
Now that the debt has been paid off, the map function has been improved, and the AI wave has stabilized, Apple finally has the time to make the map what it planned.
The reason why it has time to do this is because the Apple that once had a tacit understanding with us is no longer the Apple of 2012.
In 2012, Apple was still an "iPhone company" and most of its profits came from selling hardware. Software and services were part of its moat and were supporting facilities to make hardware sales easier.
But thirteen years later, Apple is no longer a small company.
App Store, Apple Music, iCloud, Apple Pay… the service businesses that are too numerous to list have become Apple's second largest source of revenue after the iPhone, and their profit margins are frighteningly high.
This giant has quietly transformed into a "service company."

When a trillion-dollar ecological empire is built and hardware growth begins to slow, Cook and his team will naturally turn their attention to the underutilized land within the empire.
How many advertising spaces are there in the Apple system waiting to be developed?
Apple demonstrated this as early as 2016.
At that time, in the App Store, Apple enabled Apple Search Ads: a pure bidding ranking system.
Developers (advertisers) can bid for keywords such as "notes" and "photo editing". Whoever bids higher and has stronger relevance will have their app ranked at the top of the search results.

This model proved to be very successful, and the next step was naturally the map.
From a business logic perspective, this is understandable.
Maps naturally connect search intent and offline consumption, and are one of the entrances closest to money. Apple has hundreds of millions of the world's most valuable user groups, but has left this "feng shui treasure land" idle for ten years.
To Cook, who seeks growth and efficiency, this is a waste.
Therefore, the map, which is regarded as a "tacitly agreed" private domain by users, will naturally become a "bidding booth."
As for the users who once believed in the "tacit understanding"… in the end, it was nothing more than wishful thinking.

And the introduction of Apple Search Ads to Maps didn’t just disrupt the tacit understanding.
As a user, a map is essentially a tool that is about truth and trust – we believe that it will objectively tell me the fastest way to get from point A to point B, and we believe that it will honestly tell me which cafes are nearby.
But once "bidding ranking" came in, this trust was shattered.
Once Apple Search Ads is enabled, when you search for "hot pot" on the map, the first place listed will no longer be the one with the highest rating or the closest distance, but the one that spent the most on advertising.

As a countermeasure, users can also use ratings as a measurement system to obtain relatively real information, but for the third role involved in the map – merchants, this is a more cruel era.
In this arms race for exposure, Starbucks, McDonald's, and supermarket chains have ample budgets to purchase keywords like "within 5 km," "coffee," and "lunch."
How can small independent coffee shops, husband-and-wife noodle shops, and small bookstores hidden in alleys possibly compete with those wealthy chain brands?
In the end, what the map recommends to you is no longer the best or most distinctive, but the richest.
In the end, a bidding system like this is a competition of economic strength. This result has been repeatedly confirmed on countless shopping and food delivery platforms.

▲ The picture is from social media screenshots
Of course, Apple can argue that this is just to "help merchants be better discovered", but we all know that when "discovery" requires payment, it becomes the new growth pole of the platform.
Ultimately, the map is just a microcosm. Behind it is a three-party game between the platform, merchants, and consumers. This kind of game is not uncommon, and the final results are roughly similar – consumers and merchants compromise more, and the platform earns more.
As long as the platforms, merchants and consumers exist, this kind of game will exist. This set of business logic has been repeatedly verified and is cold, hard and irrefutable.
The reason why we feel so sorry about the "fall" of Apple Maps is not because we are too naive to understand this truth. On the contrary, it is because we once thought that Apple would be the exception.
Now, this beautiful misunderstanding has finally been resolved. When the last piece of pure land is also planted with the flag of the bidding booth, the "tragedy of the commons" of the Internet is irreversible. Commercialization has become an irresistible gravity, and no corner can be spared.

What we miss is an era when “tools” were just “tools”.
The duty of a "tool" is to serve you, while the instinct of a "platform" is to manage you. When a map is no longer just responsible for "leading the way" but starts to plan which store you should go to, its identity has changed.
For a service company, providing good service is just a favor; making money is the real job. All so-called "user experience" must take a backseat to growth in financial reports.
We are witnessing one "plaza" after another irreversibly transformed into a "shopping mall". Behind this is the ultimate question that all platforms must answer: "how to make a profit."
#Welcome to follow the official WeChat public account of iFaner: iFaner (WeChat ID: ifanr), where more exciting content will be presented to you as soon as possible.




























































